Please note: Study 1 primary endpoint did not meet statistical significance. COVID-19 may have been a factor that contributed to missing data in Study 1. 31% of patients (N=38) who had at least 1 post-baseline assessment of HQ-CT (N=124) experienced interrupted visits.1
Scroll to view more
Efficacy was measured by HQ-CT Total Score, the standard for observing hyperphagia in clinical trials8,9
The HQ-CT is a validated, 9-item, caregiver-completed instrument designed for use in clinical studies.8
- The instrument was designed to assess a range of hyperphagia behaviors during the prior 2 weeks8
- Each of the 9 items was graded 0 to 4, with Total Score ranging from 0 to 368
- The instrument was completed consistently by the same caregiver in each study8
- A lower HQ-CT Total Score indicated less severe hyperphagia
.
Patients who continued VYKAT XR had less hyperphagia vs placebo at the end of the randomized withdrawal period2
HQ-CT Total Score Change at Week 16
Patients randomized to placebo had statistically significant worsening of hyperphagia vs those who continued taking VYKAT XR
- Study 2-RWP included 77 patients who completed Study 2-OLE. All patients entering the study had completed 2.5-4.5 years of treatment with VYKAT XR
- In Study 2-RWP, the mean baseline HQ-CT Total Score for patients taking VYKAT XR vs placebo was 9.0 and 8.1, respectively
- A lower HQ-CT Total Score indicated less severe hyperphagia
Changes were observed across all questions of the HQ-CT with VYKAT XR vs placebo2,4
HQ-CT item changes from baseline at Week 16 in Study 2-RWP2,4

Patients from Study 1 who continued VYKAT XR or switched from placebo had reductions in their Study 2-OLE HQ-CT Total Score3
Weeks of exposure to VYKAT XR (N=125)3

Set expectations around when patients can expect to see efficacy with VYKAT XR to ensure adherence at the start and throughout treatment.
It can take time to notice changes in hyperphagia, sometimes over many months.2,4
Helping patients stay consistent with their prescribed VYKAT XR regimens is important.
Patients who continued VYKAT XR had less hyperphagia vs placebo at the end of the randomized withdrawal period2
HQ-CT Total Score Change at Week 16
Patients randomized to placebo had statistically significant worsening of hyperphagia vs those who continued taking VYKAT XR
- Study 2-RWP included 77 patients who completed Study 2-OLE. All patients entering the study had completed 2.5-4.5 years of treatment with VYKAT XR
- In Study 2-RWP, the mean baseline HQ-CT Total Score for patients taking VYKAT XR vs placebo was 9.0 and 8.1, respectively
- A lower HQ-CT Total Score indicated less severe hyperphagia
Changes were observed across all questions of the HQ-CT with VYKAT XR vs placebo2,4
HQ-CT item changes from baseline at Week 16 in Study 2-RWP2,4

Patients from Study 1 who continued VYKAT XR or switched from placebo had reductions in their Study 2-OLE HQ-CT Total Score3
Weeks of exposure to VYKAT XR (N=125)3

Scroll to view more
Set expectations around when patients can expect to see efficacy with VYKAT XR to ensure adherence at the start and throughout treatment.
It can take time to notice changes in hyperphagia, sometimes over many months.2,4
Helping patients stay consistent with their prescribed VYKAT XR regimens is important.
Patients taking VYKAT XR should continue with their routines for managing hyperphagia10-12
- Environmental controls, behavioral management, and nutrition optimization are key to continuous management of hyperphagia11,12
- VYKAT XR can be taken with the diet plan that works best for your patients
See the safety profile for VYKAT XR
SafetyConnect with a representative and receive updates on VYKAT XR
Connect with us